Skip to content

Skyulf Profiling vs. YData Profiling vs. Sweetviz

Choosing the right EDA (Exploratory Data Analysis) tool matters. This guide offers a practical, honest comparison between Skyulf's profiling engine and two popular alternatives: YData Profiling (formerly pandas-profiling) and Sweetviz.

TL;DR

Feature Skyulf YData Profiling Sweetviz
Backend Polars (Rust) Pandas (optional Spark support) Pandas
Outputs JSON profile object; optional terminal/plots HTML report; JSON export; notebook widgets HTML report; notebook embedding
Scales to larger data Often better (Polars-based) Can scale via Spark; Pandas mode can be heavy Can be heavy (Pandas-based)
Target-Aware Analysis Yes Yes Yes
Dataset comparison report No Yes Yes
Time series analysis Yes Yes Not advertised
Causal discovery (PC algorithm) Yes Not advertised Not advertised
Rule extraction (surrogate decision tree) Yes Not advertised Not advertised
Model-based outlier detection (Isolation Forest) Yes Not advertised Not advertised
PCA projection Yes Not advertised Not advertised
Geospatial analysis (lat/lon detection) Yes Not advertised Not advertised
Subset profiling via filters Yes No No
Normality / stationarity tests Yes No No
ANOVA p-values (target interactions) Yes (optional SciPy) Not advertised Not advertised
Feature importance (from surrogate tree) Yes (scikit-learn) Not advertised Not advertised
Recommendations (drop/impute/encode hints) Yes Not advertised Not advertised
PII heuristics (email/phone) Yes Not advertised Not advertised
Leakage warnings (high corr to target) Yes Not advertised Not advertised
Correlation Matrix Yes Yes Yes
Missing Value Analysis Yes Yes Yes
Duplicate Detection Yes Yes Yes

The Honest Truth

Where Skyulf Excels

1. Performance on Large Datasets

Skyulf is built on Polars, a DataFrame library written in Rust. This makes a real difference when you're working with datasets over 100K rows. YData Profiling and Sweetviz both rely on Pandas, which can become painfully slow and memory-hungry on larger datasets.

If you regularly work with datasets that push RAM limits, Polars-based workflows tend to be more resilient than Pandas-based ones. (Exact timing depends heavily on data types, cardinality, and what options you enable.)

2. ML-Focused Analysis

Skyulf was designed with machine learning workflows in mind, not just descriptive statistics. This means:

  • Causal Discovery: Using the PC algorithm from causal-learn, Skyulf can infer potential causal relationships between variables. This helps you understand not just correlations, but which features might actually drive your target. Neither YData nor Sweetviz offers this.

  • Rule Extraction: Skyulf trains a surrogate Decision Tree on your data and extracts human-readable rules like "If Age > 50 AND Income < 30k → High Risk". This is invaluable for fraud detection, churn analysis, or any use case where you need to explain segments to stakeholders.

  • Feature Importance (from the surrogate tree): Alongside rules, Skyulf exposes feature importances from the surrogate Decision Tree. This is not a replacement for model explainability, but it’s a fast way to see which columns dominate the tree’s decisions.

  • Outlier Detection: Built-in Isolation Forest identifies anomalous rows and explains why they're outliers (which features deviate most from the median). YData shows distribution plots but doesn't flag specific outlier rows.

  • PCA Projection: Skyulf computes 2D/3D PCA projections colored by target class, helping you visually assess class separability before training a model.

  • Target Interactions with ANOVA (p-values): For categorical targets, Skyulf can compute ANOVA p-values for numeric features (when SciPy is available) and rank associations accordingly. This helps you quickly find features that differ meaningfully across target classes.

3. Specialized Domain Analysis

  • Geospatial: If your data contains latitude/longitude columns, Skyulf automatically detects them and provides bounding box statistics plus sample points for map visualization.

  • Time Series: Skyulf detects datetime columns and analyzes trends, seasonality (day-of-week, month-of-year patterns), and stationarity. This context is critical before building forecasting models.

4. API-First Design

Skyulf returns structured JSON (Pydantic models) rather than HTML. This makes it easy to: - Integrate profiling into automated pipelines - Build custom dashboards - Store profiles in databases for tracking data drift over time - Apply dynamic filters and re-analyze subsets

If you want an HTML artifact you can email around, Skyulf is not trying to replace YData/Sweetviz today. Skyulf focuses on programmatic profiling that you can embed into products.


When to Use What

Scenario Recommended Tool
Large dataset (500K+ rows) Skyulf
Need causal inference or rule extraction Skyulf
Building ML pipelines (need JSON output) Skyulf
Geospatial or time series data Skyulf
Sharing HTML reports with business users YData Profiling
Quick one-off HTML EDA on small datasets Sweetviz or YData Profiling
Comparing train/test splits visually Sweetviz
Spark/distributed environment YData Profiling

Quick Start with Skyulf

import polars as pl
from skyulf.profiling.analyzer import EDAAnalyzer
from skyulf.profiling.visualizer import EDAVisualizer

# 1. Load Data
df = pl.read_csv("your_dataset.csv")

# 2. Run Analysis
analyzer = EDAAnalyzer(df)
profile = analyzer.analyze(target_col="target")

# 3. Visualize Results (The Easy Way)
# This single class handles all the rich terminal output and matplotlib plots
viz = EDAVisualizer(profile, df)

# Print the dashboard
viz.summary()

# Show the plots
viz.plot()

Conclusion

There's no universally "best" profiling tool. Choose based on your needs:

  • If you want a polished HTML report: YData Profiling or Sweetviz.
  • If you want ML-oriented signals (rules, outliers, causal hypotheses) and an API-first profile object: Skyulf.